[Buildroot] [PATCH] [autobuild] package/bwm-ng: fix build failures with gcc-5
Yann E. MORIN
yann.morin.1998 at free.fr
Sun Aug 16 10:14:42 UTC 2015
Baruch, All,
On 2015-08-16 13:04 +0300, Baruch Siach spake thusly:
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 11:35:10AM +0200, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> > On 2015-08-14 16:45 +0200, Yann E. MORIN spake thusly:
> > > On 2015-08-14 17:15 +0300, Baruch Siach spake thusly:
> > > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 11:07:58PM +0200, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> > > > > diff --git a/package/bwm-ng/bwm-ng.hash b/package/bwm-ng/bwm-ng.hash
> > > > > +sha1 9445885d05e2430ca174739e3aba343afce94076 bwm-ng-0.6.1.tar.gz
> > > >
> > > > Why sha1?
> > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/bwmng/files/bwmng/0.6/
> > Now that I think about it, we are no longer downloading from DF.net, but
> > directly from the new official location:
> > http://www.gropp.org/?id=projects&sub=bwm-ng
> >
> > And this new location does not provide a hash... :-(
> >
> > But the file is also available on SF.net which provides this sha1.
> >
> > So I wonder: should we point to the SF.net provided sha1, even though
> > we're not downloading from there?
>
> Since the new bwm-ng website explicitly states that sf.net "will not be used
> anymore", and provided the dubious reputation of sf.net as of late, I don't
> think we can rely on their hashes in the long run, at least for this project.
> I vote for locally computed sha256 in this case.
Ack, thanks! :-)
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
--
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
| Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ |
| +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
More information about the buildroot
mailing list