[Buildroot] _VER vs. _VERSION breakage

Ulf Samuelsson ulf at atmel.com
Mon Jul 23 10:20:48 UTC 2007


>>> Your change to use _VERSION broke at least acpid. Please double-check
>>> that all packages that you touched in this patch still build fine and
>>> repair.
>>
>>Here is the result of trying to build most available packages
>>in buildroot for ARM. (I build for ARM generic (not using WCHAR)).
> 
> I will revert that _VERSION vs. _VER patch since it breaks a couple of
> packages.



>>A lot of the packages does not build for ARM,
> 
> Could be. For changes like _VER vs. _VERSION, a quick check with an x86
> build before and after such a change would have been the proper thing to
> do, imho.
> 
>>but if you can download the package, decompress it
>>in build_<arch> and then configure or patch it, 
>>then the VERSION patch is OK for this package.
> 
>>At least some of the packages seems to require the uClibc is 
>>built with WCHAR. We should probably identify these packages
>>and hide them during configuration if WCHAR is not enabled.
> 
> Yes, this is a completely different issue, though.
> 
>>
>>Some packages like ACPID does not build for ARM
>>but I think I got that right anyway, even if I did not try that
>>specific package.
>>Maybe someone building x86 can report the few packages
>>I have problems with on ARM?
> 
> No need, i'll revert said patch and let those who want such a patch to
> go in check if they break something.
> 
> Breaking the build for cosmetic reasons is not a sensible thing to do.
>

It is not only for cosmetic things alone.

Instead of reverting the patch, I can check on x86 instead today and fix if neccessary.
Please tell me which packages are broken.
acpid wass, but that should be fixed by now.


Best Regards
Ulf Samuelsson





More information about the buildroot mailing list