[Buildroot] ARM EABI builds
ben at fluff.org
Fri Jun 29 13:53:55 UTC 2007
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 04:57:32PM -0700, Tom wrote:
> Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
> >>The problem with buildroot is that it gives you a choice of ARM cpus.
> >>If you select ARM920T, then you have an expectation of being able
> >>to run the binaries produced on an ARM920T, which currently if EABI
> >>is also selected is impossible.
> >So should we not just make EABI depend on !ARM920T
1) EABI will work fine on ARM920T (and other ARMv4) targets
2) Currently, until other patches, a number of the available gcc choices
do not currently build a compiler, let alone make it to the application
3) The proposed fix in 1406 attempts to ensure that down the road we don't
fall into this trap again.
> I would say no, because this combination works for buildroot. (However,
> if you _only_ select ARM920T and EABI and don't take care of the CPU
> options, it will fail.)
Q: What's a light-year?
A: One-third less calories than a regular year.
More information about the buildroot