[Buildroot] BSP patch
rep.dot.nop at gmail.com
Thu Mar 22 13:26:09 UTC 2007
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 12:13:59AM +0100, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
>>On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 11:24:32PM +0100, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
>>>Any chance of having this reviewed soon?
>>>I am kinda stuck on AVR32 before that is applied.
>>There was someone on irc that had an alternative approach. He said that
>>he'd be in contact with you to discuss both approaches. Unfortunately
>>this discussion didn't end up on the list.. What was the outcome of that
>I think you refer to the discussions I had with Sören Straarup
>It is actually not two approaches.
>I actually have a "configs" directory as well in my private buildroot
>but I copy stuff manually to the top level.
>I think that Sören's patch is orthogonal to my work.
>The BSP patch is really there to allow two different configurations
>to be built within the same buildroot directory so they can share:
>* root file system build directory.
>but have different configurations for linux kernel and busybox
>and eventually you may want to have different content of the root file
>The solution is to create a new directory structure
>target_build_<arch>/<board> where everything is built.
>The patch allows pre/postfixes to this directory name.
>The BSP patch also put some structure on where the result ends up.
>Today everything is stored in the top directory, but if you
>want to build multiple boards, then you are going to get a lot of clutter.
We need to better differentiate between arch and cpu (generally, not in
your board support patch).
Applying your patch now locally. Let's see..
More information about the buildroot