[Buildroot] Ignored patches - WHY?
Ivan Kuten
ivan.kuten at promwad.com
Thu Oct 18 22:44:39 UTC 2007
Sushi Sensei wrote:
> I have send some patches ( 0001534, 0001533, 0001532) this week with
> the Patch Tracking page, the week before I have send the same patches
> without notices of this inclusion or error, some patch was send 2 or 3
> week before and was ignored... There are some problem with this
> patches??
Sushi, regading this lockfile-progs patch:
Index: package/lockfile-progs/lockfile-progs.mk
===================================================================
--- package/lockfile-progs/lockfile-progs.mk (revisión: 20228)
+++ package/lockfile-progs/lockfile-progs.mk (copia de trabajo)
@@ -3,11 +3,12 @@
# lockfile-progs
#
#############################################################
-LOCKFILE_PROGS_VERSION=0.1.10
+LOCKFILE_PROGS_VERSION=0.1.11
LOCKFILE_PROGS_SOURCE:=lockfile-progs_$(LOCKFILE_PROGS_VERSION).tar.gz
LOCKFILE_PROGS_SITE:=http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/l/lockfile-progs/
LOCKFILE_PROGS_CAT:=$(ZCAT)
-LOCKFILE_PROGS_DIR:=$(BUILD_DIR)/lockfile-progs-$(LOCKFILE_PROGS_VERSION)
+#LOCKFILE_PROGS_DIR:=$(BUILD_DIR)/lockfile-progs-$(LOCKFILE_PROGS_VERSION)/sid
+LOCKFILE_PROGS_DIR:=$(BUILD_DIR)/sid
LOCKFILE_PROGS_BINARY:=usr/bin/lockfile-create
....
What the meaning of
-LOCKFILE_PROGS_DIR:=$(BUILD_DIR)/lockfile-progs-$(LOCKFILE_PROGS_VERSION)
+LOCKFILE_PROGS_DIR:=$(BUILD_DIR)/sid
What does it mean "sid" ???
LOCKFILE_PROGS_DIR:=$(BUILD_DIR)/lockfile-progs-$(LOCKFILE_PROGS_VERSION)
this line is pretty good and I do not see a reason to change it. Do you?
Best regards,
Ivan
--------------------------------
Embedded Linux engineer,
Promwad Company: http://www.promwad.com/
Homepage : http://www.ivankuten.com/
--------------------------------
More information about the buildroot
mailing list