[Buildroot] Building ARM with Soft-float
rep.dot.nop at gmail.com
Fri Sep 28 21:23:45 UTC 2007
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 11:08:13PM +0200, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
>fre 2007-09-28 klockan 19:01 +0200 skrev Bernhard Fischer:
>> On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 06:28:08PM +0200, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
>> >fre 2007-09-28 klockan 10:56 +0200 skrev Ulf Samuelsson:
>> >> Tried the Integrator-926ejs default.
>> >> => This works:
>> >Beeing trying the ARM integrator softfloat the whole day.
>> >oabi, instead of eabi, generates a new problem
>> >which was not present a week ago.
>> >The C compiler seems to be built with EABI...
>You mean the gcc look at its invocation name to determine
>what it should do.
No notion of the invocation name there.
>Seems stupid to me.
Well, it isn't :P
If you disagree, http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html
>What happens if you just call it arm-linux-gcc or even gcc?
You can call it however you like. The drivers follow a somewhat stricter
layout but are hidden from users anyway.
>BTW; there are a lot of warning messages about
>calling the tools
I don't understand this.
>Should they not be called <arch>-uclibc-linux-<tool>?
I don't think so. Look at your staging_dir/usr/bin/*
More information about the buildroot