[Buildroot] [PATCH v2 1/1] openssl: convert to Makefile.autotools.in and bump version to 0.9.8g
hans-christian.egtvedt at atmel.com
Wed Aug 13 05:39:18 UTC 2008
On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 13:24 +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 02:03:31PM +0200, Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote:
> > This patch converts building of OpenSSL to use Makefile.autotools.in and bumps
> OpenSSL doesn't use autotools though, so is this a good idea?
> > +$(OPENSSL_TARGET_CONFIGURE):
> > + (cd $(OPENSSL_DIR); \
> > + $(TARGET_CONFIGURE_ARGS) \
> > + $(TARGET_CONFIGURE_OPTS) \
> > + ./Configure \
> > + linux-$(OPENSSL_TARGET_ARCH) \
> > + --prefix=/usr \
> > + --openssldir=/usr/lib/ssl \
> > + threads \
> > + shared \
> > + no-idea \
> > + no-mdc2 \
> > + no-rc5 \
> > + zlib-dynamic \
> > )
> Once you've overriden the CONFIGURE stage, is there much benefit left in
> using Makefile.autotools.in?
The Makefile is smaller now, and IMHO easier to read.
Installation of man pages, info pages and header/development works
I though the autotools was not purely for autotools stuff, but a way to
make every package simpler to read and install in a more general way?
With kind regards,
Hans-Christian Egtvedt, Applications Engineer
More information about the buildroot