[Buildroot] Atmel specific handling in buildroot
Ulf Samuelsson
ulf.samuelsson at atmel.com
Sun Feb 1 15:36:34 UTC 2009
sön 2009-02-01 klockan 16:03 +0100 skrev Peter Korsgaard:
> >>>>> "Peter" == Peter Korsgaard <jacmet at uclibc.org> writes:
>
> Peter> Hi,
> Peter> Why is it again we have special handling of Atmel targets?
>
> ..
> Peter> target/linux/Config.in.advanced: default y if BR2_TARGET_ATMEL
>
> Peter> Do we really need that? It would imho be a lot more sensible if BR
> Peter> behaved the same way for all archs.
There are several things here
1) If there is an architecture patch available for an architecture,
then it should have default yes.
I can't think of a situation where you prefer not to apply
the architecture patch for the AT91 or AVR32.
The only reason is that you are building a kernel for where
there is no valid patch.
If there is no architecture patch, then obviously
it should be default no.
2) I think that we should reduce the choice to
only have no kernel or the advanced configuration.
3) For copy to, that should be collected to a single copy to
BR
Ulf Samuelsson
>
> No objections? Good, then I'll remove them.
>
More information about the buildroot
mailing list