[Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/toolchain/gcc/4.3.2
Sven Neumann
s.neumann at phase-zero.de
Thu Feb 5 13:34:12 UTC 2009
Hi,
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 13:24 +0000, jacmet at uclibc.org wrote:
> Changeset:
> Copied: trunk/buildroot/toolchain/gcc/4.3.2/306-arm-funroll-loops.patch (from rev 25247, trunk/buildroot/toolchain/gcc/4.3.2/306-arm-funroll-loops.patch.arm)
> ===================================================================
> --- trunk/buildroot/toolchain/gcc/4.3.2/306-arm-funroll-loops.patch (rev 0)
> +++ trunk/buildroot/toolchain/gcc/4.3.2/306-arm-funroll-loops.patch 2009-02-05 13:24:11 UTC (rev 25248)
> @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
> +ChangeLog (regrename)
> +
> + gcc/
> + * regrename.c: Unshare RTX earlier in build_def_use to avoid
> + corruption of dup_loc.
> +
> +
> +Index: gcc/regrename.c
> +===================================================================
> +--- a/gcc/regrename.c (revision 197947)
> ++++ b/gcc/regrename.c (working copy)
> +@@ -783,6 +783,10 @@ build_def_use (basic_block bb)
> + recog_data.operand_type[i] = OP_INOUT;
> + }
> +
> ++ /* Unshare dup_loc RTL */
> ++ for (i = 0; i < recog_data.n_dups; i++)
> ++ *recog_data.dup_loc[i] = copy_rtx(*recog_data.dup_loc[i]);
> ++
> + /* Step 1: Close chains for which we have overlapping reads. */
> + for (i = 0; i < n_ops; i++)
> + scan_rtx (insn, recog_data.operand_loc[i],
> +@@ -813,7 +817,7 @@ build_def_use (basic_block bb)
> + OP_IN, 0);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < recog_data.n_dups; i++)
> +- *recog_data.dup_loc[i] = copy_rtx (old_dups[i]);
> ++ *recog_data.dup_loc[i] = old_dups[i];
> + for (i = 0; i < n_ops; i++)
> + *recog_data.operand_loc[i] = old_operands[i];
> + if (recog_data.n_dups)
>
That is actually a slightly different patch than what was applied
upstream in the gcc-4.3 branch, see
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39076
Both approaches are discussed here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-04/msg01577.html
Sven
More information about the buildroot
mailing list