[Buildroot] What's up with the kernel names? (Again)
Peter Korsgaard
jacmet at uclibc.org
Tue Feb 10 09:17:37 UTC 2009
>>>>> "Ulf" == Ulf Samuelsson <ulf.samuelsson at atmel.com> writes:
Hi,
>> Why? It looks like it uses LINUX26_KERNEL_NAME.
>>
Ulf> They work with the patches to u-boot which assumes
Ulf> that the name look like they used to.
Ulf> If the new naming remains, who is going to fix the u-boot patches?
See, that's the problem about adding feature patches to BR. Don't
expect other developers to spend time on fixing those things up.
Ulf> AGAIN: How can you RETROACTIVELY set _SUFFIX/_PREFIX
Ulf> if you forgot to set _SUFFIX/_PREFIX and thus
Ulf> overwrote another project.
Another project would have another BR2_PROJECT setting, and hence use
another directory, right? That was the idea behind the project thing,
wasn't it?
Ulf> Which again means fixing u-boot patches.
Ulf> Who is going to do that
Ulf> You suggested previously that the person breaking the build
Ulf> needs to fix it.
Ulf> Does that still apply?
For bugfixes yes, but for feature patches for some kind of hardware
the developer might not have access to - No.
Sure, we should try to make sure everything still works, but we also
HAVE to make it easy to do so - That means among others that the
various platforms should behave similary.
--
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
More information about the buildroot
mailing list