[Buildroot] [Bug 687] Are AT91 patches supplied with Buildroot-2009.08 out of date?
bugzilla at busybox.net
bugzilla at busybox.net
Thu Oct 29 20:01:02 UTC 2009
https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=687
Peter Korsgaard <jacmet at uclibc.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from Peter Korsgaard <jacmet at uclibc.org> 2009-10-29 20:01:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Trouble is, when it comes to applying the patches the build system falls over
> with:
>
> Applying u-boot-2009.01-001-at91rm9200.patch using plaintext:
> patching file include/asm-arm/arch-at91rm9200/at91_pio.h
> patching file include/asm-arm/arch-at91rm9200/at91_pmc.h
> patching file include/asm-arm/arch-at91rm9200/AT91RM9200.h
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 28.
It sounds like you have enabled BR2_TARGET_U_BOOT_2009_01_ARCH_AT91 (AT91
patches for u-boot-2009.01). Don't do that if you are not using the 2009.01
version of u-boot. I'll fix up kconfig so you won't be able to do so in the
future.
On a related note, you won't find support for the 9g20 in the ancient
1.2.0-atmel release, you better use the 2009.08 release instead.
> So I suppose what I am saying is that i think that the AT91 patches supplied
> with Buildroot-2009.08 are out of date or just wrong or i am doing something
> stupid that i can't see (i find it hard to believe i am the only person with
> this issue).
The AT91 patches we have are indeed fairly old, but most AT91 stuff is in
mainline nowadays, so you don't need (many) patches.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.busybox.net/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the buildroot
mailing list