[Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] gcc: remove option on SJLJ exceptions
Thomas Petazzoni
thomas.petazzoni at free-electrons.com
Thu Jul 29 11:38:37 UTC 2010
Hello,
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 05:38:06 -0500
"Michael S. Zick" <minimod at morethan.org> wrote:
> And of course you confirmed that the Lua package's
> error handling still works properly, complete with
> same backtrace that is produced when SJLJ exceptions are enabled.
No, I did not.
> You did make that test didn't you?
Why do you need to be so aggressive ? It is possible that removing this
option was a mistake, but there's *really* no need to be so
aggressive. It only reduces the motivation to look at the problem...
So, trying to be constructive, how can I test that Lua still produces
correct backtraces ? (I'm not a Lua programmer at all).
Thanks,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
More information about the buildroot
mailing list