[Buildroot] [PATCH] target skeleton definition

[Dmytro Milinevskyy]

Thomas, Peter,

some targets depend on busybox skeleton. Are you sure it's safe to
remove it completely?

-- Dima

On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 12:17 AM, Peter Korsgaard <jacmet at uclibc.org> wrote:
>>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni at free-electrons.com> writes:
>
>  Thomas> Hello Dmytro,
>  Thomas> On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 21:06:42 +0300
>  Thomas> Dmytro Milinevskyy <milinevskyy at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>  >> Here's the patch to give posibility to redefine path to the rootfs
>  >> skeleton. Also this patch moves default and busybox skeleton trees
>  >> into fs/skeleton dir.
>
>  Thomas> Thanks for this patch. In general, this is something I intended to do,
>  Thomas> so it's great to see patches implementing this.
>
>  Thomas> Personaly, I'd prefer if we could get rid of the "busybox" skeleton
>  Thomas> altogether. I think Peter Korsgaard agreed with this decision, but I'll
>  Thomas> let him restate his preference here.
>
> Yes, I think now would be a good moment to cleanup this stuff.
>
>  Thomas> If Peter agrees, then the skeleton could be moved to just fs/skeleton/.
>
> --
> Bye, Peter Korsgaard
> _______________________________________________
> buildroot mailing list
> buildroot at busybox.net
> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
>