[Buildroot] [PATCH] htop: new package
Thomas Petazzoni
thomas.petazzoni at free-electrons.com
Fri Jan 14 17:14:37 UTC 2011
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:14:33 -0600
ANDY KENNEDY <ANDY.KENNEDY at adtran.com> wrote:
> > Your patch is word-wrapped. Could you check your e-mail
> > client configuration ? You should probably try git send-email, as this
> > will guarantee that your patches will make it properly to the list,
> > without being word-wrapped or damaged in anyway by the mail client
> > you're using.
>
> GGGGRRRRR!!! I'm using Outlook and I'm behind an Exchange server. To
> that end, will git sendmail work?
No. Tell your network administrator that not having a real SMTP server
prevents you from working efficiently. There's nothing useful you can
do without a real SMTP server.
Of course, if you can SSH out to another box that has a SMTP server
available, that would work.
> > None of those options are perfect, but we'd like to avoid adding
> dozens
> > and dozens of options at the Buildroot level to tweak every possible
> > option of uClibc.
>
> Nah, no reason to. The HTOP guys say that their next release will auto
> detect the presence of backtrace and use it if it is there, so we'll
> skip right on past 0.9 when they get it fixed.
Great.
> > Patch lacks a description of why it is needed and the Signed-off-by
> > line.
>
> Hmm, so naming the file htop-cross-no-proc-check is not sufficient for
> the comment? Will fix and resubmit.
In that case, I admit it's a bit silly, but that's the rule :-)
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
More information about the buildroot
mailing list