[Buildroot] prefer static libraries question
rep.dot.nop at gmail.com
Sat Jun 18 19:38:28 UTC 2011
On Jun 18, 2011 8:47 PM, "Mike Frysinger" <vapier at gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Friday, April 22, 2011 09:25:27 Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 18:36:54 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > might be better to rename or add a new option. then the build logic
> > > is clear: if user *prefers* static linking, we'll still build/install
> > > shared libs, but we'll generate static programs everywhere. if the
> > > user *only* wants static builds, then we can skip the shared lib
> > > stuff entirely.
> > Does the "prefers" use case really makes sense ? I have always found
> > our BR2_PREFER_STATIC_LIB a bit odd, and I think it should be
> > BR2_USE_STATIC_LIB instead, and compile everything statically.
> > What do you think ?
> i agree on all points
Iirc it was me who added it and the initial intention was to only end up
with everything static, yes.
> buildroot mailing list
> buildroot at busybox.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the buildroot