[Buildroot] [PATCH] efl/libecore: fix build with gcrypt
Peter Korsgaard
jacmet at uclibc.org
Tue Jan 1 14:36:31 UTC 2013
>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni at free-electrons.com> writes:
Thomas> When building with gnutls, libecore also needs libgcrypt.
Thomas> Fixes:
Thomas> http://autobuild.buildroot.org/results/4da454d6414cf8f4e638defae9b793fb46a0a072/build-end.log
Thomas> While we're at it, also explicit the --enable-openssl /
Thomas> --disable-openssl depending on whether openssl is available or not.
Thomas> Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni at free-electrons.com>
Thomas> ---
Thomas> package/efl/libecore/libecore.mk | 8 +++++++-
Thomas> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Thomas> diff --git a/package/efl/libecore/libecore.mk b/package/efl/libecore/libecore.mk
Thomas> index 0220017..e824bfa 100644
Thomas> --- a/package/efl/libecore/libecore.mk
Thomas> +++ b/package/efl/libecore/libecore.mk
Thomas> @@ -36,10 +36,16 @@ endif
Thomas> ifeq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_OPENSSL),y)
Thomas> LIBECORE_DEPENDENCIES += openssl
Thomas> +LIBECORE_CONF_OPT += --enable-openssl
Thomas> +else
Thomas> +LIBECORE_CONF_OPT += --disable-openssl
Thomas> endif
Thomas> ifeq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_GNUTLS),y)
Thomas> -LIBECORE_DEPENDENCIES += gnutls
Thomas> +LIBECORE_DEPENDENCIES += gnutls libgcrypt
No, we shouldn't pull in dependencies behind the users' back. I've
changed it to only activate when both gnutls and libgcrypt are present.
Committed with that change, thanks.
--
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
More information about the buildroot
mailing list