[Buildroot] Architecture build statistics
Chris Zankel
chris at zankel.net
Tue Oct 29 20:11:46 UTC 2013
Hi Thomas,
Great statistics. Xtensa definitely needs some work here ;-)
I looked into the failures a while ago and started to create patches.
However, one major issue was lacking NPTL support in uClibc. We are
currently working on it and are getting close to support it. This
already should push the pct columns higher :-)
Thanks,
-Chris
On 10/29/13, 12:41 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> This e-mail is intentionally Cc'ed to a number of people who are
> working on specific architectures in Buildroot, and specifically the
> architectures having the highest number of problems in the autobuilders.
>
> I generated some statistics of the number of failed builds vs.
> successful builds since July, 1st 2013, and here are the results
> (ordered from the worst architecture to the best one) :
>
> +------------+---------+----------+-------+------------+------------+
> | arch | success | failures | total | pctsuccess | pctfailure |
> +------------+---------+----------+-------+------------+------------+
> | bfin | 10 | 607 | 617 | 1.6207 | 98.3793 |
> | microblaze | 6 | 308 | 314 | 1.9108 | 98.0892 |
> | nios2 | 2 | 49 | 51 | 3.9216 | 96.0784 |
> | xtensa | 13 | 314 | 327 | 3.9755 | 96.0245 |
> | avr32 | 34 | 305 | 339 | 10.0295 | 89.9705 |
> | mips64el | 162 | 498 | 660 | 24.5455 | 75.4545 |
> | aarch64 | 82 | 243 | 325 | 25.2308 | 74.7692 |
> | arc | 95 | 234 | 329 | 28.8754 | 71.1246 |
> | sh4a | 158 | 171 | 330 | 47.8788 | 51.8182 |
> | mipsel | 172 | 168 | 340 | 50.5882 | 49.4118 |
> | mips | 172 | 165 | 337 | 51.0386 | 48.9614 |
> | arm | 2302 | 1788 | 4097 | 56.1875 | 43.6417 |
> | powerpc | 2794 | 1616 | 4411 | 63.3416 | 36.6357 |
> | sh4 | 208 | 120 | 328 | 63.4146 | 36.5854 |
> | x86_64 | 874 | 412 | 1288 | 67.8571 | 31.9876 |
> | i686 | 2369 | 572 | 2943 | 80.4961 | 19.4359 |
> +------------+---------+----------+-------+------------+------------+
>
> It would be really nice if the people working on those architectures in
> Buildroot could contribute a little bit more to fix the autobuilders
> failures, or at least get in touch with us to discuss how to solve
> them, or if they have no clue how to solve them.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Thomas
More information about the buildroot
mailing list