[Buildroot] [PATCH 4 of 6 v2] uclibc: only add targets if uclibc is enabled
Thomas De Schampheleire
patrickdepinguin at gmail.com
Fri Aug 1 19:37:27 UTC 2014
Hi Thomas, Yann, all,
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 11:13 PM, Thomas Petazzoni
<thomas.petazzoni at free-electrons.com> wrote:
> Dear Thomas De Schampheleire,
>
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 21:58:05 +0200, Thomas De Schampheleire wrote:
>
>> In analogy of linux.mk, only enable its targets (in particular the kconfig
>> targets (menuconfig, update-config, ...) when the uclibc package is actually
>> enabled.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas De Schampheleire <thomas.de.schampheleire at gmail.com>
>>
>> ---
>> v2: rebase after making kconfig-package a full infra
>>
>> Note: now that kconfig-package is a full package infra (inheriting from
>> generic-package) this may seem a bit odd, as other packages do not do this.
>> Nevertheless, it does not hurt and will slightly improve the parsing of the
>> Makefiles when the package is not selected.
>>
>> package/uclibc/uclibc.mk | 2 ++
>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff -r 083076145a2b -r 540167f28c2d package/uclibc/uclibc.mk
>> --- a/package/uclibc/uclibc.mk Tue Jul 22 20:35:36 2014 +0200
>> +++ b/package/uclibc/uclibc.mk Wed Jul 23 20:12:32 2014 +0200
>> @@ -539,7 +539,9 @@
>> $(UCLIBC_INSTALL_UTILS_STAGING)
>> endef
>>
>> +ifeq ($(BR2_TOOLCHAIN_BUILDROOT_UCLIBC),y)
>> $(eval $(kconfig-package))
>> +endif
>
> I actually don't like this that much, because I like a lot the fact
> that I can do "make <foo>-source" "make <foo>-extract", "make
> <foo>-patch" or even "make <foo>" (though this last case, for the
> specific situation of uClibc doesn't seem really possible).
>
> Though it's true it can be considered a bit strange to allow "make
> <foo>-patch" but not "make <foo>-menuconfig".
I fully understand what you say. I also use that feature a lot.
Given that linux added such a check around its menuconfig target
(which you added by the way) and the fact that we are extracting
everything in a kconfig-package infrastructure, there are three ways
to proceed:
- introduce the check in each of the kconfig-based packages
- remove the check from each of the kconfig-based packages
- introduce another way in kconfig-package to only allow menuconfig
when the package is selected
What is your preference here?
Thanks,
Thomas
More information about the buildroot
mailing list