[Buildroot] [PATCH 02/10] manual: document minimal kernel headers dependency

[Yann E. MORIN]

Thomas, All,

On 2014-02-16 21:45 +0100, Thomas De Schampheleire spake thusly:
> "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998 at free.fr> schreef:
> >On 2014-02-16 21:03 +0100, Thomas De Schampheleire spake thusly:
> >> "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998 at free.fr> schreef:
[--SNIP--]
> >> >+* Kernel headers
> >> >+** Dependency synbol: +BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_X_Y+, (replace
> >> >+   +X_Y+ with the proper version, see +toolchain/toolchain-common.in+)
> >> >+** Comment string: `headers >= X.Y` (replace +X.Y+ with the
> >> >+   proper version)
> >> 
> >> Are these backticks?
> >> Is there a specific reason you use this instead of single or double quotes?
> >
> >I just duplicated what wah done for C++, a few lines below.
> >
> >Lookign at the other comments, it looks like C++ is the only one using
> >backticks, the others use the +blabla+ format.
> >
> >Will fix bot before submitting again.
> 
> Ah now I understand again: the pluses in c++ required me to use backticks.
> While giving the feedback to you I forgot this was asciidoc syntax, sorry.
> Then it doesn't really matter...

Well, I can just use +foo+ for the headers version, it makes it more
in-line with the other comments, C++ is an exception.

Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.

-- 
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
|  Yann E. MORIN  | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software  Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN     |  ___               |
| +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------:  X  AGAINST      |  \e/  There is no  |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL    |   v   conspiracy.  |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'