[Buildroot] [PATCH] manual: Add a note for dependency comment format

[Thomas Petazzoni]

Dear Maxime Hadjinlian,

On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 15:35:37 +0100, Maxime Hadjinlian wrote:
> Hi Thomas, all
> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Thomas Petazzoni
> <thomas.petazzoni at free-electrons.com> wrote:
> > Dear Maxime Hadjinlian,
> >
> > On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 14:05:48 +0100, Maxime Hadjinlian wrote:
> >> Add a quick note to clarify that the format of the depencency comments
> >> applies irregardless of the number of dependencies.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Maxime Hadjinlian <maxime.hadjinlian at gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >>  docs/manual/adding-packages-directory.txt | 1 +
> >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/docs/manual/adding-packages-directory.txt b/docs/manual/adding-packages-directory.txt
> >> index 3dc5395..b6dc981 100644
> >> --- a/docs/manual/adding-packages-directory.txt
> >> +++ b/docs/manual/adding-packages-directory.txt
> >> @@ -205,6 +205,7 @@ aircrack-ng needs a toolchain w/ largefile, threads
> >>
> >>  Note that this text is kept brief on purpose, so that it will fit on a
> >>  80-character terminal.
> >> +This format must be repected even if there is only one dependency.
> >
> > I'm not sure what you mean here. Could you explain a bit more?
> The examples always give with n depedency. Someone may ask himself if
> this format is valid for only one depedency.
> Should it reduce the with to w/, etc...

Then it is unclear, because your sentence come right after the sentence
mentioning the 80-character limit. So when I read this, I thought you
were saying "even when there is a single dependency, the text must fit
on a 80-character terminal", which doesn't made much sense.

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com