[Buildroot] [PATCH] ARC: update tools to arc-2015.06 release

[Alexey Brodkin]

Hi Romain,

On Fri, 2015-07-17 at 13:55 +0200, Romain Naour wrote:
> Le 17/07/2015 13:45, Romain Naour a écrit :
> > Hi Alexey,
> > 
> > Le 15/07/2015 14:51, Alexey Brodkin a écrit :
> > > I'm happy to update GNU tools for ARC cores to the most recent
> > > arc-2015.06 release.
> > > 
> > > This release brings following major improvements:
> > >  * GCC: source update to v4.8.4
> > >  * GCC: C ABI compatibility between MetaWare and GNU toolchains
> > >  * uClibc: support for thread local storage and Native Pthread Library (NPTL)
> > >  * GDB: updated to version 7.9.1
> > > 
> > > Also a lot of fixes and improvements has been done, please refer to
> > > https://github.com/foss-for-synopsys-dwc-arc-processors/toolchain/releases/tag/arc-2015.06
> > > for more details.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin at synopsys.com>
> > > Cc: Anton Kolesov <akolesov at synopsys.com>
> > > Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni at free-electrons.com>
> > > Cc: Peter Korsgaard <peter at korsgaard.com>
> > > Cc: Romain Naour <romain.naour at openwide.fr>
> > > ---
> > > 
> > > I hope this time all required pieces are in place :)
> > 
> > Your patch looks good, but I have a build failure with uclibc:
> > 
> > make O=test/arc/ toolchain 2>&1 | tee build-arc-toolchain.log
> > 
> > > > > uclibc arc-2015.06 Patching
> > support/kconfig/merge_config.sh -m -O /home/naourr/git/buildroot/test/arc/build/uclibc-arc-2015.06 
> > package/uclibc/uClibc-snapshot.config 
> > Using package/uclibc/uClibc-snapshot.config as base
> > #
> > # merged configuration written to /home/naourr/git/buildroot/test/arc/build/uclibc-arc-2015.06/.config (needs make)
> > #
> >   MKDIR include/config
> >   MKDIR include/generated
> >   MKDIR extra/config/lxdialog
> >   HOSTCC-o extra/config/conf.o
> >   GEN extra/config/zconf.tab.c
> >   GEN extra/config/zconf.lex.c
> >   GEN extra/config/zconf.hash.c
> > /bin/sh: test/arc//extra/config/zconf.hash.c: No such file or directory
> > Makefile:70: recipe for target 'test/arc//extra/config/zconf.hash.c' failed
> > make[3]: *** [test/arc//extra/config/zconf.hash.c] Error 1
> > make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> > /bin/sh: test/arc//extra/config/zconf.tab.c: No such file or directory
> > /bin/sh: test/arc//extra/config/zconf.lex.c: No such file or directory
> > Makefile:70: recipe for target 'test/arc//extra/config/zconf.tab.c' failed
> > make[3]: *** [test/arc//extra/config/zconf.tab.c] Error 1
> > Makefile:70: recipe for target 'test/arc//extra/config/zconf.lex.c' failed
> > make[3]: *** [test/arc//extra/config/zconf.lex.c] Error 1
> > Assembler messages:
> > Fatal error: can't create test/arc//extra/config/conf.o: No such file or directory
> > Makefile:64: recipe for target 'test/arc//extra/config/conf.o' failed
> > make[3]: *** [test/arc//extra/config/conf.o] Error 1
> > Makefile.in:465: recipe for target 'test/arc//extra/config/conf' failed
> > make[2]: *** [test/arc//extra/config/conf] Error 2
> > package/uclibc/uclibc.mk:485: recipe for target '/home/naourr/git/buildroot/test/arc/build/uclibc-arc
> > -2015.06/.config' failed
> > make[1]: *** [/home/naourr/git/buildroot/test/arc/build/uclibc-arc-2015.06/.config] Error 2
> > Makefile:36: recipe for target 'toolchain' failed
> > make: *** [toolchain] Error 2
> > 
> > It seems a issue related of out of tree build...
> > The same issue happen with 2015.06-rc1/
> > 
> > However, it build fine without 'O='.
> > 
> > Humm, I tried to build different version of uClibc (-ng, -snapshot and -arc)
> > and the out of tree build is broken.
> > 
> > Yann, have you an idea, is it a kconfig-package issue ?
> 
> I'm on master 0daffc0b65aa86d6d5bc6916736e0cffcdf540cc (setools: Add missing
> bison dependency). So after "core/out-of-tree: fix Makefile wrapper".

It's pretty interesting.
I'm on 5eb5f2710c2451d7e35dd600e6ced835efb9dda5 (funny enough it's your commit)
"package/libmemcached: disable documentation" and for me ARC toolchain gets built
with O=xxx (I always build out of tree).

So yes probably we're seeing some regression.

-Alexey