[Buildroot] [PATCH] bind: fix intermittent build issues with high BR2_JLEVEL

Jan Heylen heyleke at gmail.com
Fri Nov 6 07:04:35 UTC 2015


Hi,

On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 10:42 PM, Thomas Petazzoni <
thomas.petazzoni at free-electrons.com> wrote:

> Dear Jan Heylen,
>
> Thanks for your patch!
>
> On Thu,  5 Nov 2015 11:57:34 +0100, Jan Heylen wrote:
> > From: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet at sunsite.dk>
>
> I am not sure it is appropriate to send a patch in the name of someone
> else. Maybe you're taking one of Peter's previous commit, and
> re-applying it, but the context is different, so I believe it should be
> under your own name.
>
OK, just wanted to point out it is the same issue (and the same solution).

>
> >
> > Build sometimes breaks with:
> >
> > libtool: link: `unix/os.lo' is not a valid libtool object
> > make[3]: *** [rndc-confgen] Error 1
> > make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> > make[4]: Leaving directory
> `/scratch/peko/build/bind-9.6-ESV-R4/bin/rndc/unix'
> >
> > So disable parallel builds.
>
> I've been trying to reproduce the parallel build issue, and I haven't
> been able to do so. It seems our autobuilders also didn't catch it.
>

Example of the output (paths shrink-ed):


<during compilation of bind>
libtool: link: `unix/os.lo' is not a valid libtool object
make[3]: *** [named] Error 1
make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make[4]: Leaving directory `<CUT>/output/build/bind-9.9.7/bin/named/unix'
make[3]: Leaving directory `<CUT>/output/build/bind-9.9.7/bin/named'
make[2]: *** [subdirs] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `<CUT>/output/build/bind-9.9.7/bin'
make[1]: *** [subdirs] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `<CUT>/output/build/bind-9.9.7'
make: *** [<CUT>/output/build/bind-9.9.7/.stamp_built] Error 2

How often are you able to reproduce it ? On what type of build machine ?
>

We are on the  2015.05, Released May 31st, 2015 Buildroot release.

We build a couple of times a day on a centos 7 environment: 8 cores, 32G
mem.

 processor : 7
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 60
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4770 CPU @ 3.40GHz
stepping : 3
microcode : 0x1c
cpu MHz : 3390.171
cache size : 8192 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 8
core id : 3
cpu cores : 4
apicid : 7
initial apicid : 7
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 13
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat
pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb
rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good nopl xtopology
nonstop_tsc aperfmperf eagerfpu pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx
est tm2 ssse3 fma cx16 xtpr pdcm pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic movbe popcnt
tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm abm ida arat epb
xsaveopt pln pts dtherm tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid fsgsbase
tsc_adjust bmi1 avx2 smep bmi2 erms invpcid
bogomips : 6784.08
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 39 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

So nothing special?

BR2_JLEVEL is set to '0' (so auto)

We do build multiple defconfigs (up to 8) (in separate buildroot working
folders) at once on the same machine. But I see from the buildroot output
that BR2_JLEVEL is set to '9' (cores +1) for each of these jobs?

>>> bind 9.9.7 Building
PATH="<CUT>/output/host/bin:<CUT>/output/host/sbin:<CUT>/output/host/usr/bin:<CUT>/output/host/usr/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin"
 /usr/bin/make -j9  -C <CUT>/output/build/bind-9.9.7/
make[1]: Entering directory `<CUT>/output/build/bind-9.9.7'
making all in <CUT>/output/build/bind-9.9.7/make


Maybe the exact condition is to have multiple buildroot jobs (8) on 8 cores
with BR2_JLEVEL set to 8 (so 8*8 = 64 'jobs').

So we might optimize that on our side ;-), but still it shouldn't trigger
this error?

Jan


> Thanks,
>
> Thomas
> --
> Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
> Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
> http://free-electrons.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20151106/6ff79e76/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the buildroot mailing list