[Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] board/freescale: refresh create-boot-sd.sh

Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind.be
Wed Oct 14 21:10:56 UTC 2015


On 14-10-15 18:04, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
> Dear Vincent,
> 
> Vincent Stehlé wrote:
>> Starting with version 2.26, sfdisk defaults to a unit of 512 B sectors.
>> With those recent versions of sfdisk, the create-boot-sd.sh script ends
>> up creating a boot partition of 240 KB, which is too small to contain a
>> Linux kernel.
> 
> Ouch!
> 
>>
>> Version 2.25 of sfdisk and older defaulted to cylinders; a
>> media-dependant unit, typically much larger than 512 B. With those
>> versions the create-boot-sd.sh creates paritions, large enough to hold a
> 
> paritions -> partitions, and remove the ',' after it.
> 
>> kernel.
>>
>> We update the create-boot-sd.sh script to use the more readable and more
>> stable named-fields sfdisk format for the partitioning command, and set
>> the boot partition size to 64 MB, which should be enough for everyone.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vincent Stehlé <vincent.stehle at freescale.com>
>> Cc: Luca Ceresoli <luca at lucaceresoli.net>
>> Cc: Gary Bisson <gary.bisson at boundarydevices.com>
>> ---
>>   board/freescale/create-boot-sd.sh | 4 ++--
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/board/freescale/create-boot-sd.sh
>> b/board/freescale/create-boot-sd.sh
>> index af45115..cfb1101 100755
>> --- a/board/freescale/create-boot-sd.sh
>> +++ b/board/freescale/create-boot-sd.sh
>> @@ -60,8 +60,8 @@ sync
>>   # - FAT partition starting at 1MB offset, containing uImage and *.dtb
>>   # - ext2/3 partition formatted as ext2 or ext3, containing the root filesystem.
>>   sfdisk ${DEV} <<EOF
>> -32,480,b
>> -512,,L
>> +start=1MiB, size=64MiB, type=b
> 
> Is the "MiB" suffix supported on older sfdisk releases? Ubuntu 14.04
> ships sfdisk 2.20.1, and its manpage does not contain "MiB".
> 
> If that is not supported, then I guess "--unit M" should work. It's in
> the manpage, but I haven't tested it yet.
> 
> I strongly think we should support the latest Ubuntu LTS, AFAIK it's
> widely used by embedded Linux developers.

 We should also still support Ubuntu 12.02 IMHO and even older RHEL.

 So to avoid this kind of issue, it would be better to use genimage. But that's
a much bigger change, of course.


 Regards,
 Arnout

-- 
Arnout Vandecappelle                          arnout at mind be
Senior Embedded Software Architect            +32-16-286500
Essensium/Mind                                http://www.mind.be
G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium           BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
GPG fingerprint:  7493 020B C7E3 8618 8DEC 222C 82EB F404 F9AC 0DDF



More information about the buildroot mailing list