[Buildroot] [PATCH 03/21 v2] core: move pkg-utils.mk to support/
Arnout Vandecappelle
arnout at mind.be
Mon Oct 26 20:12:00 UTC 2015
On 22-10-15 23:20, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> Arnout, All,
>
> On 2015-10-22 23:10 +0200, Arnout Vandecappelle spake thusly:
>> On 22-10-15 22:33, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
>>> pkg-utils.mk contains various definitions that are used in the package
>>> infrastructures and packages themselves.
>>>
>>> However, those definitions can be useful in other parts of Buildroot,
>>> and are already used in a few places that are not related to the package
>>> infrastructure. Also, $(sep) will be needed early in the Makefile when
>>> we eventually support multiple br2-external trees.
>>>
>>> Since this file only contains definitions, we can include it anytime.
>>>
>>> So, consider that file to no longer be specific to the package infras:
>>> - move it to support and rename it,
>>> - move a few similar definitions from the main Makefile to that file.
>>
>> Actually I think a lot more should move to support. For instance, pkg-* is
>> actually not just for packages but also for linux, bootloaders, toolchain. And
>> even package/Makefile.in (with a better name then :-).
>
> I do agree. But I think this can be done in a separate series.
Yeah sorry I should have mentioned that: as a separate series indeed.
> The current series is about adding multi-br2-external support, so only
> includes whatever is necessary to achieve that goal.
>
> I can queue a rework of the support materials as you suggest, but that
> will be done in a separate series (and hopefully not a requirement
> before this one is condered! ;-) ).
>
>>> Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998 at free.fr>
>>> Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni at free-electrons.com>
>>> Cc: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet at uclibc.org>
>>> ---
>>> Makefile | 10 ++-----
>>> package/pkg-utils.mk | 59 ----------------------------------------
>>> support/misc/utils.mk | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>
>> If you agree that more stuff should move to support, I think there should be a
>> new directory support/make or support/mk.
>
> As I said, we can move it later when doing the support rework.
OK.
>> BTW, why didn't the rename detection catch this? Did you change too much? In
>> that case, perhaps it's better to do it in two patches? :-P
>
> It was not caught because it is less than 50% (actually, 49%!) so git did
> not detect a copy (or a rename either).
If you send a v2, could you set -M40% so the rename is detected?
Regards,
Arnout
--
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be
Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500
Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be
G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
GPG fingerprint: 7493 020B C7E3 8618 8DEC 222C 82EB F404 F9AC 0DDF
More information about the buildroot
mailing list