[Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] Add config to nfsd to set number of threads

[Andreas Ehmanns]

Am 15.04.2016 um 11:00 schrieb Arnout Vandecappelle:
>
>
> On 04/15/16 10:37, Andreas Ehmanns wrote:
>> Am 26.02.2016 um 00:30 schrieb Arnout Vandecappelle:
>>> On 02/25/16 21:40, Andreas Ehmanns wrote:
>>>> Yann,
>>>> is the patch o.k. for you? Shall I resend it using git?
>>>   Yes, please send using git. Patches sent as attachments have an 
>>> even bigger
>>> chance of being ignored than other patches.
>>>
>>>   However, I can already say that it should be two separate patches: 
>>> one changing
>>> "done" to OK/FAIL, and a second one doing the functional changes.
>>>
>>>   Regards,
>>>   Arnout
>>
>> Yann, Arnout,
>> can someone of you please check what happened with this patch? It's 
>> more than
>> one month and a half ago that I sent it and it seems that it is still 
>> not
>> incorporated?
>
>  We are unfortunately swamped with patches that need review, and we 
> don't have enough people doing reviews. And we're not willing to 
> forego on quality by accepting patches without review.
>
>  We will get to your patches eventually, because they are tracked in 
> patchwork. Note that the oldest pending patch is 9 months old, to give 
> you an idea of what you can expect.

Arnout,
I wasn't aware of that. So it seems that I was a little bit too impatient.

Thanks for the clarification and I will have a look if I can follow your 
recommendation and review some patches.

Regards,
Andreas

>
>
>  What you can do to speed things up:
>
> - Help out with reviewing and testing. Look at some (non-trivial) 
> patches that are relevant to you (e.g. affecting a package that you 
> use), download and test it, then give it your Tested-by tag. You can 
> also go over the changes, look for any mistakes that you can identify, 
> and give feedback or give it your Reviewed-by tag. Obviously, your 
> reviews will not immediately carry the same weight as those of 
> long-time buildroot developers, but they are really helpful.
>
> - Reply to your patches with 'ping', so they appear on the top of the 
> stack again. Note that this doesn't help that much because we're still 
> swamped. But it does at least tell us that you will be paying 
> attention if we have any feedback to give.
>
>
>  Regards,
>  Arnout
>
>> Is there something from my side what is missing?
>>
>> Additionally I sent a set of patches for the netsnmp init script one 
>> day before
>> which are also not incorporated?
>> Can you please have a look?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Andreas
>>
>>>
>>>> Please let me know.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Andreas
>>>>
>>>> Am 12.02.2016 um 10:31 schrieb Andreas Ehmanns:
>>>>> Yann,
>>>>> indeed a killall -9 worked. So I reworked the patch. According to 
>>>>> Thomas'
>>>>> recommendation I added the OK/FAIL output as done in the dropbox 
>>>>> init script.
>>>>> Please have a look at the attached patch. If it's o.k., I'll 
>>>>> resend it using
>>>>> git.
>>> [snip]
>>>
>>
>