[Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] iputils: resolve musl compatibility

[Matthew Weber]

Thomas,

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:44 AM, Thomas Petazzoni
<thomas.petazzoni at free-electrons.com> wrote:
> Matt,
>
> On Tue, 19 Jan 2016 21:04:23 -0600, Matthew Weber wrote:
>
>> >> diff --git a/package/iputils/iputils.mk b/package/iputils/iputils.mk
>> >> index 7510d99..d427b11 100644
>> >> --- a/package/iputils/iputils.mk
>> >> +++ b/package/iputils/iputils.mk
>> >> @@ -4,13 +4,12 @@
>> >>  #
>> >>  ################################################################################
>> >>
>> >> -IPUTILS_VERSION = s20121011
>> >> -IPUTILS_SITE = http://www.skbuff.net/iputils
>> >> -IPUTILS_SOURCE = iputils-$(IPUTILS_VERSION).tar.bz2
>> >> -IPUTILS_LICENSE = GPLv2+, BSD-3c
>> >> +IPUTILS_VERSION = c8ff6feaf0442f8efd96ccb415770c54f9e84d47
>> >> +IPUTILS_SITE = $(call github,iputils,iputils,$(IPUTILS_VERSION))
>> >
>> > I don't understand why you are moving to github.
>> > http://www.skbuff.net/iputils has some recent tarballs, which
>> > correspond to the releases made on github.
>> > http://www.skbuff.net/iputils/iputils-s20151218.tar.bz2 will most
>> > likely contain the musl fixes.
>>
>> The releases don't match.  The github repository was forked in 2014 to
>> pull fixes from other distrobutions and centralize the changes after
>> the upstream seemed to have gone dormant.  So the fork is the only
>> repo that has the musl and other IPv6 updates.  I should have
>> referenced the email link.
>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg279881.html
>> Thoughts?
>
> OK, understood. Can you just put this in a comment in the .mk file?
>

Done, all changes in v3.

-- 
Thanks,
Matt