[Buildroot] [PATCH 00/12 v8] Introduce libudev (branch yem/libudev-4)
Peter Korsgaard
peter at korsgaard.com
Wed Jul 27 21:37:56 UTC 2016
>>>>> "Yann" == Yann E MORIN <yann.morin.1998 at free.fr> writes:
Hi Yann,
>> So I'm not sure if it's really worth the effort. After all, installing
>> only libudev without eudev is not really supported upstream (we have to
>> trick by building only some subdirectories).
>>
>> I'm not entirely decided yet, so I'm waiting for arguments. But I'm
>> hesitating between merging this, or asking people who really care about
>> this to simply remove the eudev daemon in a post-build script.
> But then you would not have libudev if you use mdev or a static /dev.
Is that a common use case? I wouldn't expect anybody to use static /dev
any more, and if you are using mdev then that is presumably for running
scripts on hotplug events? If so, why not just use the udev daemon for
this?
I do understand this could be useful for using libudev with devtmpfs
/dev, but wouldn't a simple post-build script to rm S10udev + udevd get
us 90% of the way without any extra complexity?
--
Venlig hilsen,
Peter Korsgaard
More information about the buildroot
mailing list