[Buildroot] [PATCH 00/10] Bump NXP package versions

Thomas Petazzoni thomas.petazzoni at free-electrons.com
Mon Jun 6 20:33:45 UTC 2016


Hello,

On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 16:32:28 +0200, Gary Bisson wrote:

> First of all, thank you for taking care of this update. It's good to
> have someone else looking at those ;-)

And thanks to you for reviewing!

> I'm ok moving things to freescale-imx, I think it makes it easier for
> people looking at i.MX-specific packages instead of browsing through
> both hardware handling packages and multimedia libraries.
> However I guess Thomas and/or Peter will have ack this change.

We normally want all packages to be directly under package/, precisely
because it is easier to find them this way.

The only case where we accept to have sub-directories for groups of
packages is when several packages need to share some variables, like
package/qt5/qt5.mk.

For freescale-imx stuff, it seems like the only variable left shared by
various packages in FREESCALE_IMX_SITE, and in fact it's already used
outside of package/freescale-imx/.

So I would almost suggest to get rid of the sub-directory, and move
this variable, as well as the other macro defined in freescale-imx.mk
to another file, though I'm not sure which one.

Peter?

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com



More information about the buildroot mailing list