[Buildroot] [PATCH] toolchain: also source the musl package

[Peter Korsgaard]

>>>>> "Yann" == Yann E MORIN <yann.morin.1998 at free.fr> writes:

 > We do source the glibc and uClibc packages in the toolchain menu,
 > because they do provide user-visible options. However, we do not so
 > far source the musl Config.in file

 > However, in 822be87 (toolchain: include C libraries in legal-info),
 > a Config.in file for musl was explicitly created, so that:
 >   - legal-info woudl work (needed at the time, probably no longer needed
 >     nowadays),
 >   - the appropriate packages are enabled, linke netbsd-queue or kernel
 >     headers.

 > Yet, we do not source musl/Config.in, which means we do not get
 > netbsd-queue or kernel-headers to be selected:

 >     $ make distclean; make menuconfig
 >         Toolchain  --->
 >           C library ---> musl
 >       save-and-exit
 >     $ grep BR2_PACKAGE_LINUX_HEADERS .config
 >         [nothing]
 >     $ grep BR2_PACKAGE_NETBSD_QUEUE .config
 >         [nothing]

 > Fix that by sourcing musl/Config.in at the same place we source glibc
 > and uClibc.

 > Normally, we do have a check in place that verifies that a package
 > that is not enabled is not a dependency of another package that is
 > enabled. However, musl is only a dependency of host-gcc-final, which
 > is a host package and has no corresponding BR2_PACKAGE_HOST_GCC_FINAL.
 > Thus host-gcc-final is not in the PACKAGES variable, and thus does not
 > trigger our check.

 > Reported-by: Vicente Olivert Riera <Vincent.Riera at imgtec.com>
 > Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998 at free.fr>
 > Cc: Vicente Olivert Riera <Vincent.Riera at imgtec.com>
 > Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni at free-electrons.com>

Committed, thanks.

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard