[Buildroot] [PATCH] valgrind: disable for MIPS soft-float

Vicente Olivert Riera Vincent.Riera at imgtec.com
Mon May 23 11:58:28 UTC 2016


Hi Thomas,

On 23/05/16 12:55, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Mon, 23 May 2016 12:31:51 +0100, Vicente Olivert Riera wrote:
> 
>> diff --git a/package/valgrind/Config.in b/package/valgrind/Config.in
>> index 21b2608..40e219d 100644
>> --- a/package/valgrind/Config.in
>> +++ b/package/valgrind/Config.in
>> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ config BR2_PACKAGE_VALGRIND
>>  		   BR2_powerpc || BR2_powerpc64 || BR2_powerpc64le || \
>>  		   BR2_x86_64
>>  	depends on !BR2_STATIC_LIBS
>> +	depends on !BR2_MIPS_SOFT_FLOAT
> 
> I am wondering if it isn't better to do:
> 
>         depends on BR2_ARM_CPU_ARMV7A || BR2_i386 || \
> -                  BR2_mips || BR2_mipsel || BR2_mips64 || BR2_mips64el || \
> +                  ((BR2_mips || BR2_mipsel || BR2_mips64 || BR2_mips64el) && !BR2_MIPS_SOFT_FLOAT) || \
>                    BR2_powerpc || BR2_powerpc64 || BR2_powerpc64le || \
>                    BR2_x86_64
> 
> But I'm not sure. It's completely equivalent from a functionality point
> of view, I'm just wondering which one is more logical.

I prefer mine.

We have architecture support in one block, and features support in
another one. More readable IMHO.

Anyway, you can commit whichever you want as at the end of the day they
will have the same functionality.

Regards,

Vincent.

> Thomas
> 



More information about the buildroot mailing list