[Buildroot] [PATCH] core/legal-info: allow ignoring packages from the legal-info
Yann E. MORIN
yann.morin.1998 at free.fr
Sat Oct 15 15:32:46 UTC 2016
Peter, All,
On 2016-10-15 17:13 +0200, Peter Korsgaard spake thusly:
> >>>>> "Yann" == Yann E MORIN <yann.morin.1998 at free.fr> writes:
>
> > It might be necessary to not even mention a package in the output of
> > legal-info:
>
> > - virtual packages have virtually nothing to save in the legal-info
> > output;
>
> > - for proprietary packages, it might not even be legal to even
> > mention them, being under NDA or some other such restrictive
> > conditions.
>
> > Introduce the new FOO_GEN_LEGAL_INFO variable that a package can set
> > to 'NO' (default to 'YES') to indicate that the package should be
> > completely ignored from the legal-info output, in which case the
> > package is not mentioned in the maniufest, its source archive,
> > patches and license files are not saved into legal-info/ .
>
> Couldn't / shouldn't the 2nd part already be handled by
> <foo>_REDISTRIBUTE = NO and/or <foo>_LICENSE = PROPRIETARY?
No, because for a proprietary license, you may still have to at least
list it in the manifest.
For example, the nvidia-driver package has a proprietary license, is not
redistributable, but we must still list it in the manifest.
I'll update the commit log accordingly. Thanks! ;-)
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
--
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
| Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ |
| +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
More information about the buildroot
mailing list