[Buildroot] [PATCH] xlib_libXv: correct license type

[Peter Korsgaard]

>>>>> "Peter" == Peter Korsgaard <peter at korsgaard.com> writes:

 > The license is actually closer to ICS than MIT, E.G.:
 > https://opensource.org/licenses/ISC
 > vs
 > https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT

 > From COPYING:
 > Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its
 > documentation for any purpose and without fee is hereby granted,
 > provided that the above copyright notice appear in all copies and that
 > both that copyright notice and this permission notice appear in
 > supporting documentation, and that the names of Digital or MIT not be
 > used in advertising or publicity pertaining to distribution of the
 > software without specific, written prior permission.

 > E.G.  this is the normal ICS text which has been extended with a BSD-3c
 > style advertisinc clause.  Both are permissive licenses, but it is more
 > correct to call it ICS-like.

 > Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter at korsgaard.com>

Committed after fixing up the s/ICS/ISC/ mixup and adding a note about
the OpenBSD license template as pointed out by Rahul, thanks!

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard