[Buildroot] [PATCH] xlib_libXv: correct license type
Peter Korsgaard
peter at korsgaard.com
Fri Mar 17 23:38:40 UTC 2017
>>>>> "Peter" == Peter Korsgaard <peter at korsgaard.com> writes:
>>>>> "Peter" == Peter Korsgaard <peter at korsgaard.com> writes:
>> The license is actually closer to ICS than MIT, E.G.:
>> https://opensource.org/licenses/ISC
>> vs
>> https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
>> From COPYING:
>> Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its
>> documentation for any purpose and without fee is hereby granted,
>> provided that the above copyright notice appear in all copies and that
>> both that copyright notice and this permission notice appear in
>> supporting documentation, and that the names of Digital or MIT not be
>> used in advertising or publicity pertaining to distribution of the
>> software without specific, written prior permission.
>> E.G. this is the normal ICS text which has been extended with a BSD-3c
>> style advertisinc clause. Both are permissive licenses, but it is more
>> correct to call it ICS-like.
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter at korsgaard.com>
> Committed after fixing up the s/ICS/ISC/ mixup and adding a note about
> the OpenBSD license template as pointed out by Rahul, thanks!
Committed to 2017.02.x, thanks.
--
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
More information about the buildroot
mailing list