[Buildroot] [PATCH v4 2/8] gst-plugins-${base, good, bad, ugly}: bump to 1.14.0

Thomas Petazzoni thomas.petazzoni at bootlin.com
Wed Apr 11 09:35:56 UTC 2018


Hello,

On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 08:56:56 +0200, Peter Seiderer wrote:

> > Not sure to understand what you say here. Do you say: "This option
> > already exists in the current version of GStreamer packaged by
> > Buildroot, and continues to exist in 1.14.0 and therefore should be
> > kept in Buildroot, i.e BR2_PACKAGE_GST1_PLUGINS_BAD_LIB_OPENGL_WAYLAND
> > should stay.  
> 
> I think the BR2_PACKAGE_GST1_PLUGINS_BAD_LIB_OPENGL_WAYLAND could/should
> move to base, but the waylandsink enabling BR2_PACKAGE_GST1_PLUGINS_BAD_PLUGIN_WAYLAND
> should stay in bad....(maybe the confusion comes from the double use of
> --enable-wayland option in gst1-plugins-bad enabling wayland support in
> libGstGl and/or enabling the waylandsink element)...
> 
> From package/gstreamer1/gst1-plugins-bad/gst1-plugins-bad.mk:
> 
> ifneq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_GST1_PLUGINS_BAD_LIB_OPENGL_WAYLAND)$(BR2_PACKAGE_GST1_PLUGINS_BAD_PLUGIN_WAYLAND),)
> GST1_PLUGINS_BAD_CONF_OPTS += --enable-wayland
> GST1_PLUGINS_BAD_DEPENDENCIES += wayland wayland-protocols
> else
> GST1_PLUGINS_BAD_CONF_OPTS += --disable-wayland
> endif
> 
> 
> From package/gstreamer1/gst1-plugins-bad/Config.in:
> 
> config BR2_PACKAGE_GST1_PLUGINS_BAD_LIB_OPENGL_WAYLAND
>         bool "wayland"
>         default y
>         depends on BR2_PACKAGE_GST1_PLUGINS_BAD_LIB_OPENGL_EGL
>         depends on BR2_PACKAGE_WAYLAND
>         select BR2_PACKAGE_WAYLAND_PROTOCOLS
>         select BR2_PACKAGE_GST1_PLUGINS_BAD_LIB_OPENGL_HAS_WINDOW
> [...]
> config BR2_PACKAGE_GST1_PLUGINS_BAD_PLUGIN_WAYLAND
>         bool "wayland"
>         default y
>         depends on BR2_PACKAGE_WAYLAND
>         select BR2_PACKAGE_WAYLAND_PROTOCOLS
>         help
>           Wayland Video Sink
> 
> I get a running waylandsink with:
> 
> # BR2_PACKAGE_GST1_PLUGINS_BASE_LIB_OPENGL_WAYLAND is not set
> BR2_PACKAGE_GST1_PLUGINS_BAD_PLUGIN_WAYLAND=y

Still not sure to fully understand what you're proposing. Do you think
you could take over this series, make the changes that you think are
necessary and resubmit ? This would be useful to help the discussion
move forward.

Thanks!

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com



More information about the buildroot mailing list