[Buildroot] [PATCH 1/8] firmware-imx: bump to version 7.5
Thomas Petazzoni
thomas.petazzoni at bootlin.com
Sun Jul 29 13:08:25 UTC 2018
Hello,
On Sat, 28 Jul 2018 23:53:44 +0200, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
> On 25-07-18 17:01, Gary Bisson wrote:
> > This new package includes new binaries for i.MX8QXP.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gary Bisson <gary.bisson at boundarydevices.com>
>
> I've applied this patch to master, the rest is changes requested.
I don't know if we have been clear enough with Gary about what changes
we want. Do we want to stay with a virtual package ? If so, what should
be the name of the virtual package vs. the name of the package for the
"old" i.MX VPUs ?
On my side, while I agree that imx-vpu-cnm violates the rule of "we
name packages like their upstream name", I believe this is a violation
that is acceptable because the naming chosen by Gary is the one that is
the easiest to understand and the most obvious: imx-vpu is the virtual
package, imx-vpu-hantro and imx-vpu-cnm are the providers.
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
More information about the buildroot
mailing list