[Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] haproxy: disable on sh4 with gcc < 7
Fabrice Fontaine
fontaine.fabrice at gmail.com
Mon Jan 28 21:10:16 UTC 2019
Dear Peter,
Le lun. 28 janv. 2019 à 22:08, Peter Korsgaard <peter at korsgaard.com> a écrit :
>
> >>>>> "Fabrice" == Fabrice Fontaine <fontaine.fabrice at gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Build fails on sh4:
> > src/dns.c:290:1: error: unable to find a register to spill in class 'R0_REGS'
> > }
>
> > This build failure seems related to a known gcc bug that has been fixed
> > only in gcc 7:
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60040
>
> > Fixes:
> > - http://autobuild.buildroot.org/results/2e181cc874d5389f10ecddb0d11253c3aa5e7fc4
>
> > Signed-off-by: Fabrice Fontaine <fontaine.fabrice at gmail.com>
> > ---
> > package/haproxy/Config.in | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> > diff --git a/package/haproxy/Config.in b/package/haproxy/Config.in
> > index cbcbc0c388..78cbf6e103 100644
> > --- a/package/haproxy/Config.in
> > +++ b/package/haproxy/Config.in
> > @@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
> > config BR2_PACKAGE_HAPROXY
> > bool "haproxy"
> > + # https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60040
> > + depends on !(BR2_sh4 && !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_7)
>
> Have you btw verified that this only happens on sh4 and not the other sh
> variants?
Nope, I will test it and keep you informed of the results.
>
> --
> Bye, Peter Korsgaard
Best Regards,
Fabrice
More information about the buildroot
mailing list