[Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] docs/manual/adding-packages-python.txt: fix outdated Python 3 sentence.
raphael.melotte at essensium.com
raphael.melotte at essensium.com
Mon Sep 9 11:58:07 UTC 2019
From: Raphaël Mélotte <raphael.melotte at essensium.com>
Python packages should no longer depend on BR2_PACKAGE_PYTHON
in their config file, unless they are only compatible with Python 2.
Signed-off-by: Raphaël Mélotte <raphael.melotte at essensium.com>
---
docs/manual/adding-packages-python.txt | 10 +++++++---
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/docs/manual/adding-packages-python.txt b/docs/manual/adding-packages-python.txt
index 15137cfd6d..74e2e78b29 100644
--- a/docs/manual/adding-packages-python.txt
+++ b/docs/manual/adding-packages-python.txt
@@ -67,9 +67,13 @@ Python build system, but are not Python modules, can freely choose
their name (existing examples in Buildroot are +scons+ and
+supervisor+).
-In their +Config.in+ file, they should depend on +BR2_PACKAGE_PYTHON+
-so that when Buildroot will enable Python 3 usage for modules, we will
-be able to enable Python modules progressively on Python 3.
+Packages that are only compatible with one version of Python (as in:
+Python 2 or Python 3) should depend on that version explicitely in
+their +Config.in+ file (+BR2_PACKAGE_PYTHON+ for Python 2,
++BR2_PACKAGE_PYTHON3+ for Python 3). Packages that are compatible
+with both versions should not explicitely depend on them in their
++Config.in+ file, since that condition is already expressed for the
+whole "External python modules" menu.
The main macro of the Python package infrastructure is
+python-package+. It is similar to the +generic-package+ macro. It is
--
2.21.0
More information about the buildroot
mailing list