[Buildroot] [PATCH v8 0/5] package/python-scipy: new package

[Jagan Teki]

Hi Yann,

On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 8:31 PM Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998 at free.fr> wrote:
>
> Jagan, All,
>
> On 2020-04-07 19:13 +0530, Jagan Teki spake thusly:
> > On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 5:19 PM Thomas Petazzoni
> > <thomas.petazzoni at bootlin.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue,  7 Apr 2020 16:45:10 +0530
> > > Jagan Teki <jagan at amarulasolutions.com> wrote:
> > > > This is v8 changes for python-scipy, here is the previous
> > > > version series[1].
> > > Thanks for this new iteration. Could you have a look at the backlog of
> > > patches at http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/buildroot/list/ and
> > > update any patch that is no longer relevant due to this new iteration
> > > to the state "Superseded" ? You can do that yourself for the patches
> > > that you have sent (provided that you have a patchwork account matching
> > > the e-mail used to send the patches). For the other patches, you can
> > > simply let us know, and we'll update the patch status.
> > >
> > > This helps us keep a patchwork backlog that makes sense.
> >
> > Yes, I've updated all my previous version changes. regarding pybind11,
> > adam has this series [2]. I already incorporated test patch in my
> > series as per his request.
> > [2] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/buildroot/list/?series=145831
>
> So I've marked the seriers from Adam as superseded.
>
> However, there was a review of his pybind11 patch: since it installs
> only a header, it should be _INSTALL_TARGET = NO

The main difference between Adam vs my patch is I'm trying to build
pybind11 as a host package as it has dependency with scipy. If Adam is
required to use even for target, maybe he can add a patch on top of
this to support the target package. Let me know if it makes sense or
any other thoughts?

Jagan.