[Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/linux-pam: security bump to version 1.5.1

[Fabrice Fontaine]

Le jeu. 26 nov. 2020 à 17:06, Peter Korsgaard <peter at korsgaard.com> a écrit :
>
> >>>>> "Fabrice" == Fabrice Fontaine <fontaine.fabrice at gmail.com> writes:
>
>  > Fix CVE-2020-27780 - authentication bypass when a user doesn't exist and
>  > root password is blank
>
>  > https://github.com/linux-pam/linux-pam/releases/tag/v1.5.1
>
>  > Signed-off-by: Fabrice Fontaine <fontaine.fabrice at gmail.com>
>  > ---
>  >  package/linux-pam/linux-pam.hash | 4 ++--
>  >  package/linux-pam/linux-pam.mk   | 2 +-
>  >  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
>  > diff --git a/package/linux-pam/linux-pam.hash b/package/linux-pam/linux-pam.hash
>  > index 15e67a5e4c..10cd7be9c4 100644
>  > --- a/package/linux-pam/linux-pam.hash
>  > +++ b/package/linux-pam/linux-pam.hash
>  > @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>  >  # Locally computed hashes after checking signature at
>  > -# https://github.com/linux-pam/linux-pam/releases/download/v1.5.0/Linux-PAM-1.5.0.tar.xz.asc
>  > +# https://github.com/linux-pam/linux-pam/releases/download/v1.5.1/Linux-PAM-1.5.1.tar.xz.asc
>  >  # signed with the key 8C6BFD92EE0F42EDF91A6A736D1A7F052E5924BB
>  > -sha256  02d39854b508fae9dc713f7733bbcdadbe17b50de965aedddd65bcb6cc7852c8  Linux-PAM-1.5.0.tar.xz
>  > +sha256  201d40730b1135b1b3cdea09f2c28ac634d73181ccd0172ceddee3649c5792fc  Linux-PAM-1.5.1.tar.xz
>  >  # Locally computed
>  >  sha256  133d98e7a2ab3ffd330b4debb0bfc10fea21e4b2b5a5b09de2e924293be5ff08  Copyright
>  > diff --git a/package/linux-pam/linux-pam.mk b/package/linux-pam/linux-pam.mk
>  > index 176830c1d3..61d9542c02 100644
>  > --- a/package/linux-pam/linux-pam.mk
>  > +++ b/package/linux-pam/linux-pam.mk
>  > @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
>  >  #
>  >  ################################################################################
>
>  > -LINUX_PAM_VERSION = 1.5.0
>  > +LINUX_PAM_VERSION = 1.5.1
>
> Ehh, we only have 1.4.0 in master and next?
Indeed, the patch to bump linux-pam to version 1.5.0 was not applied
yet, I'll send a v2.
>
> It would be good to notice that this security issue only exists in pam
> 1.5.0.
>
> --
> Bye, Peter Korsgaard
Best Regards,

Fabrice