[Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/wireguard-linux-compat: add missing comment about kernel dependency
Yann E. MORIN
yann.morin.1998 at free.fr
Sat Oct 16 12:10:10 UTC 2021
Peter, All,
On 2021-10-16 10:46 +0200, Peter Korsgaard spake thusly:
> >>>>> "Fabrice" == Fabrice Fontaine <fontaine.fabrice at gmail.com> writes:
> > Add a comment when kernel is not enabled (missing since the addition of
> > the package in commit de591c5c3a93a40d049a32bd79c30cc66daf5fb2)
[--SNIP--]
> Is this really a sensible comment? I would imagine that needing a Linux
> kernel is an obvious requirement for a kernel driver?
Remember that some people build their kernel outside of Buildroot, or
do not build it at all, so they may not think of this as "an obvious
requirement"...
I agree with Fabrice: we have that comment in quite some places, and
this is explicitly documented in our manual:
18.2.5. Dependencies on a Linux kernel built by buildroot
Some packages need a Linux kernel to be built by buildroot. These
are typically kernel modules or firmware. A comment should be added
in the Config.in file to express this dependency, similar to
dependencies on toolchain options. The general format is:
foo needs a Linux kernel to be built
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
--
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
| Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ |
| +33 561 099 427 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
More information about the buildroot
mailing list