[Buildroot] [PATCH] package/opensc: add package

[José Pekkarinen]

On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 7:18 PM Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout at mind.be> wrote:

>   Hi José,
>
>   Same comments on this patch as what Gilles gave on the softhsm2 one.
>
> On 08/10/2021 13:03, José Pekkarinen wrote:
> > The following patch will add a recipe to
> > install opensc in final images.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: José Pekkarinen <jose.pekkarinen at unikie.com>
> > ---
> >   package/opensc/Config.in |  7 +++++++
> >   package/opensc/opensc.mk | 15 +++++++++++++++
>
>   You need to add it to package/Config.in, you need to add a hash file,
> and
> preferably also add yourself to DEVELOPERS for this package.
>
>   It's also convenient if you put the two packages together in a series,
> because
> the DEVELOPERS and package/Config.in are likely to cause conflicts.
>
> >   2 files changed, 22 insertions(+)
> >   create mode 100644 package/opensc/Config.in
> >   create mode 100644 package/opensc/opensc.mk
> >
> > diff --git a/package/opensc/Config.in b/package/opensc/Config.in
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000000..abd26a9b08
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/package/opensc/Config.in
> > @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
> > +config BR2_PACKAGE_OPENSC
> > +     bool "opensc"
> > +     depends on BR2_PACKAGE_LIBOPENSSL && BR2_PACKAGE_PCSC_LITE
> > +     help
> > +             OpenSC provides a set of libraries and utilities to work
> with smart cards.
>
>   Indentation + wrapping. Please use utils/check-package to verify.
>
> > +
> > +             https://github.com/OpenSC/OpenSC.git
>
>   The URL shouldn't have a .git part. That said, a better location is
> https://github.com/OpenSC/OpenSC/wiki
>
>
> > diff --git a/package/opensc/opensc.mk b/package/opensc/opensc.mk
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000000..7741dac2a5
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/package/opensc/opensc.mk
> > @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
> >
> +################################################################################
> > +#
> > +# opensc
> > +#
> >
> +################################################################################
> > +
> > +OPENSC_VERSION = 0.22.0
> > +OPENSC_SITE = $(call github,OpenSC,OpenSC,$(OPENSC_VERSION))
>
>   There's an uploaded tarball at
>
> https://github.com/OpenSC/OpenSC/releases/download/0.22.0/opensc-0.22.0.tar.gz
>
> > +OPENSC_LICENSE = GPL-2
>
>   I haven't checked in detail, but it seems to be LGPL-2.1+
>
> > +OPENSC_LICENSE_FILES = LICENSE
>
>   This file doesn't even exist.
>
> > +OPENSC_DEPENDENCIES = openssl pcsc-lite
> > +OPENSC_AUTORECONF = YES
>
>   You need to add a comment why this is needed. It probably isn't with the
> uploaded tarball.
>
> > +OPENSC_INSTALL_TARGET = YES
>
>   This is unnecessary (default). _INSTALL_STAGING, on the other hand, *is*
> necessary.
>
> > +
> > +$(eval $(autotools-package))
> >
>

Hi,

Thanks for the help and guidance, while reading the

v2 of the patch I find the following warning I don't quite understand,
and I don't find any relevant docs over the net, would you mind to
elaborate what could it mean the following warning from check-package:

$ ./utils/check-package package/opensc/*
package/opensc/opensc.mk:8: remove default value of _SOURCE variable (
http://nightly.buildroot.org/#generic-package-reference)
25 lines processed
1 warnings generated

while the package looks like this:

$ cat package/opensc/opensc.mk
################################################################################

#
# opensc
#
################################################################################


OPENSC_VERSION = 0.22.0
OPENSC_SOURCE = opensc-$(OPENSC_VERSION).tar.gz
OPENSC_SITE =
https://github.com/OpenSC/OpenSC/releases/download/$(OPENSC_VERSION)/
OPENSC_LICENSE = LGPL-2.1+
OPENSC_LICENSE_FILES = COPYING
OPENSC_DEPENDENCIES = openssl pcsc-lite
OPENSC_INSTALL_STAGING = YES

$(eval $(autotools-package))

Thanks!

José.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.buildroot.org/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20211020/521adf41/attachment.html>